93
edits
Characteristics of Zionism: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Translation (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{text start}} {{question}} What are the characteristics of Zionists?{{question end}} {{Answer}} The characteristics of Zionism are often described as racism, materialism, wealth accumulation through illegitimate means, and land grabbing to achieve political dominance over the territories of other nations. Zionists consider Jews to be a superior race endowed with virtue and honor, while viewing non-Jews as inferior, despised, and subservient to them. Zionists have an in...") |
Translation (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The characteristics of Zionism are often described as racism, materialism, wealth accumulation through illegitimate means, and land grabbing to achieve political dominance over the territories of other nations. | The characteristics of Zionism are often described as racism, materialism, wealth accumulation through illegitimate means, and land grabbing to achieve political dominance over the territories of other nations. | ||
Zionists consider Jews to be a superior race endowed with virtue and honor, while viewing non-Jews as inferior, despised, and subservient to them. Zionists have an intense desire for wealth and material gain, and practices such as usury and bribery are more prevalent among them than others. Zionists are willing to engage in any action to achieve wealth, even if it contradicts their religious beliefs or jeopardizes the dignity and reputation of others. | Zionists consider [[Judaism|Jews]] to be a superior race endowed with virtue and honor, while viewing non-Jews as inferior, despised, and subservient to them. Zionists have an intense desire for wealth and material gain, and practices such as usury and bribery are more prevalent among them than others. Zionists are willing to engage in any action to achieve wealth, even if it contradicts their religious beliefs or jeopardizes the dignity and reputation of others. | ||
Another enduring characteristic of the Zionist movement is their greed for land acquisition. This trait is considered a political phenomenon because Zionists believe that the presence of Israel in a region is only guaranteed when Jews settle there, seize the land, and cultivate it themselves. | Another enduring characteristic of the Zionist movement is their greed for land acquisition. This trait is considered a political phenomenon because Zionists believe that the presence of Israel in a region is only guaranteed when Jews settle there, seize the land, and cultivate it themselves. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Another enduring characteristic of the Zionist movement is their greed for land acquisition. This trait is considered a political phenomenon for two reasons: | Another enduring characteristic of the Zionist movement is their greed for land acquisition. This trait is considered a political phenomenon for two reasons: | ||
Zionists believe that the presence of Israel in a region is only guaranteed when Jews settle there, seize the land, and cultivate it themselves.<ref>Jaris and Lobel, Zionism in Palestine, pp. 11–13.</ref> | * Zionists believe that the presence of Israel in a region is only guaranteed when Jews settle there, seize the land, and cultivate it themselves.<ref>Jaris and Lobel, Zionism in Palestine, pp. 11–13.</ref> | ||
If political dominance over a land is interpreted as requiring the possession of larger and more extensive territories, the logical conclusion is that to sever the political ties of Arabs to their land, their connection to their properties must be destroyed.<ref>Jaris and Lobel, Zionism in Palestine, pp. 11–13.</ref> | |||
Sabri Jaris says about this: "In our opinion, before the establishment of the State of Israel, the first view was dominant because, at that time, the lands purchased by Zionist Jews were far from sufficient to provide a new life for immigrants. The second view has been their hallmark since the establishment of the state." | * If political dominance over a land is interpreted as requiring the possession of larger and more extensive territories, the logical conclusion is that to sever the political ties of Arabs to their land, their connection to their properties must be destroyed.<ref>Jaris and Lobel, Zionism in Palestine, pp. 11–13.</ref> Sabri Jaris says about this: "In our opinion, before the establishment of the State of Israel, the first view was dominant because, at that time, the lands purchased by Zionist Jews were far from sufficient to provide a new life for immigrants. The second view has been their hallmark since the establishment of the state." | ||
The illegal acquisition of land and the expulsion of Palestinian Arabs from their ancestral territories stem, on one hand, from the Zionists' materialism and greed for wealth, as they are willing to trample on the rights of others to achieve worldly gains. On the other hand, their sense of superiority and racism has caused intense global disdain toward them, isolating them in international forums. This isolation and frustration have sown the seeds of hostility in their hearts, leading them to establish their own state, thus laying the foundations of the Zionist state.<ref>Jaris and Lobel, Zionism in Palestine, pp. 11–13.</ref> | The illegal acquisition of land and the expulsion of Palestinian Arabs from their ancestral territories stem, on one hand, from the Zionists' materialism and greed for wealth, as they are willing to trample on the rights of others to achieve worldly gains. On the other hand, their sense of superiority and racism has caused intense global disdain toward them, isolating them in international forums. This isolation and frustration have sown the seeds of hostility in their hearts, leading them to establish their own state, thus laying the foundations of the Zionist state.<ref>Jaris and Lobel, Zionism in Palestine, pp. 11–13.</ref> | ||